|

Critiquing Local Theatre

ON CRITICISM - by G.L. Horton

A reader says: Most of the major media decided that for some reason, The Complete History of America - Abridged was not worth their time. (Let me say that the smaller local papers have raved about both shows.)

Alas, the majors weren't the only ones who ducked "History of Am". I finked out on writing about it for AisleSay myself, and in doing so probably deprived Spiral of reviews by Larry Stark and Beverly Creasey, who usually assume that I will volunteer to transport them by auto to Outer Suburbia. OTOH, I did drive them to Cuckoo's Nest, and the resultant favorable reviews are still available on the TheaterMirror.com site, for all Net-able Newsies to peruse.

I'm sorry didn't come to "History" to appreciate the acting-- I don't doubt that you were all inventive and charming. I enjoyed "Complete Shakespeare" in Edinburgh in the 80's, when the creators were kids and tickets cost 2 bucks: but many subsequent productions later, either I'm losing my sense of humor or the "Abridged" guys' jokes have worn thin. I thought it best to spare people the sight of me sitting there grim as Queen Victoria when "not amused", and the even more depressing sight of a review written by someone incabable of responding to the show on its own terms. There are enough of those already!

The Globe and the Herald, however, are not taking what I feel are their responsibilities to the public and the arts community seriously.

I couldn't agree more.

Is there any way for us to work together to encourage them to focus on local theater?

If people are moved to write letters, in this opportune moment when a new Globe management team will be setting policy, how about protesting the Globe's recent ploy of burying theatre reviews in the back of sections other than "Arts"? How about the "paper of record's" neglect of its function as record? Nobody at the Globe seems to care that this community has a history. For instance, a big Sunday Magazine article on Commonwealth Shakespeare is written in apparent ignorance of other and previous Shakespeare-producing institutions in Boston. The article makes it sound as if this new growth sprouted in a cultural desert. A few hours in the newspaper's own morgue would provide much evidence to the contrary.

2) Today (Fri) the "Stages" column discusses the upcoming production of "Spunk" at Barrington Stage with reference to NYC and Chicago-- no mention that Boston's New Rep mounted the show some seasons back. No reason that Barrington's self-promotion should be aware of a Boston production: but the Globe's journalism? I think it should. If enough readers agreed, the paper would make an effort. (7/23/99)

 

Archives—Essays and Commentary

Actors & Acting

On Criticism

Political Commentary

Literature

Plays: Shakespeare

Plays: Modern

Women's Issues

On Writing & Directing

Miscellaneous




 
home | bio | resume | blog | contact GL Horton
monologues | one-act plays | full-length plays
reviews | essays | links | videos
 

Made on an iMac by Websites 4 Small Business.